Pages

Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

Andre Geim on writing

 Andre Geim describe what he learnt from his Russian literature teacher (from the biography)

"I also learned an important lesson from my tutorials in Russian literature. My tutor said that what I was writing was good but it was clear from my essays that I tried to recall and repeat the thoughts of famous writers and literature critics, not trusting my own judgement, afraid that my own thoughts were not interesting, important or correct enough. Her advice was to try and explain my own opinions and ideas and to use those authoritative phrases only occasionally, to support and strengthen my writing. This simple advice was crucial for me – it changed the way I wrote. Years later I noticed that I was better at explaining my thoughts in writing than my fellow students."

Symbols above the letters (for scientific publications)

When writing papers, we often come up with author(s) names with symbols above some characters of author(s) names.

How do you use those symbols in LaTeX?

Here is a Wikipedia link where the details are provided.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic

In order to use in LaTeX, a number of answers in the following SE site is given.

https://tex.stackexchange.com/tags/accents/info

Some of the frequently used symbols are (from SE site):

Text mode

Plain TeX makes it possible to typeset the most commonly used accents:
  • \` (grave accent): à
  • \' (acute accent): á
  • \^ (circumflex or “hat”): â
  • \" (umlaut or dieresis): ä
  • \~ (tilde or “squiggle”): ã
  • \= (macron or “bar”): ā
  • \. (dot accent): ȧ
  • \u (breve accent): ă
  • \v (háček or “check”): ǎ
  • \H (long Hungarian umlaut): ő
  • \t (tie-after accent): a͡
  • \c (cedilla): ş
  • \d (dot-under accent): ạ
  • \b (bar-under accent): ο̩
  • \k (ogonek): ą
The Unicode character encoding UTF8 includes several special characters and characters with accents. The following code specifies that the encoding of the LaTeX document source file is UTF8. As font encoding is specified T1, because it supports the encoding of extended character sets in fonts:
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
Of course, the encoding in the text editor needs to be set to utf8, as well.

Math mode

The following commands may be used only in math mode to produce accents;
  • \hat{o} (circumflex): enter image description here
  • \widehat{oo} (wide version of \hat over several letters): enter image description here
  • \check{o} (vee or check): enter image description here
  • \tilde{o} (tilde) enter image description here
  • \widetilde{oo} (wide tilde) enter image description here
  • \acute{o} (acute accent): enter image description here
  • \grave{o} (grave accent): enter image description here
  • \dot{o} (dot over the letter): enter image description here
  • \ddot{o} (two dots over the letter): enter image description here
  • \breve{o} (breve): enter image description here
  • \bar{o} (macron): enter image description here
  • \vec{o} (vector (arrow) over the letter): enter image description here

English phrases for writing papers

Following list may be useful for writing papers, articles, etc.

"In recent years” vs “in the recent years”

Native speakers would generally prefer the second. The article is unnecessary and awkward. Both are correct. Personally, I find them all awkward and am much more likely to say things like "over the last few years" or just "recently".

Ref: https://english.stackexchange.com/a/59603/161843

How to write a paper quickly?

Top 10 rules
Note that writing a paper to journal is a painstaking effort and takes a lot of time for researchers in their early career (some times even for experts too). Sometimes, it may be possible for an expert to write a complete paper from conception to submission format. These are considered to be an exception. Personally, I take at least six months to come with the first draft of the manuscript. Here is one of the ways to write papers quickly for a journal of conference. 
  1. Start with the hypothesis and start writing. Don't procrastinate. Write from the starting of the work, when you are doing experiment, write the methodology.
  2. Review the notes and renew the literature search, and refine your conception and hypothesis
  3. Determine who your audience is - most likely reviewers, so get their concerns firstly addressed
  4. Create the outline and get the big picture done, i.e., complete the first draft while resisting the temptation to correct and edit as you go; the logical sequence of data/tables/figures may be the outline; while writing the first draft, take notes indicating what references might be needed and would be about, but don't stop to collect the references
  5. Begin with the easier part of the task - experimental section rather then the introduction; then follows the results and discussion section
  6. Then comes the really hard part - critical editing where you make sure that the English is coherent and the science is correct
  7. Write the conclusion in a numbered format
  8. Then comes the abstract and the acknowledgements
  9. Now comes the introduction, the two most important things to address in which are the purpose and relevant background
  10. Then collect the references.
  11. Use Latex for writing your paper. No matter how complicated your paper is, LaTeX will give you a best final draft.
Reference

Writing Good Papers (Prof. Michal Lipson)

Top advice form Prof. Michal Lipson, 

  1. Don't write paper for those 10 people who is specialized in your area (who will read no matter what). Our goal should be to reach much broader community (broader audience) 
  2. In one minute of grasping you paper, the reader should know what you did
  3. Paper should be crisp clear and easy to read (should not be hard to read). Writing your research without clarity may have no effect even though your work has potential to form a new field in research
  4. Tell your story in one minute.
Golden Rules

1. Cut! This seems to be the most important rule. Reduce any unnecessary word or phrases (cut many, anything subjective). Cut efficiently. Say aloud and write it. When we say something, we say clearly and simply. Just write as you explain to some one else. After writing, hunt down every word that will distract the reader from the main point you make. Very, really, basically, quite, generally - these words don't add much. Write without these sentences. Avoid starting with "there are". Following are the unnecessary phrases: for the most part, for the purpose of, in the case of, in the final analysis, in the event that, it has been estimated that, it may be argued that (come straight), as far as we know, as we know. Remove clunky phrases (with the word in bracket):  A majority of (most), A number of (many), Are of the same opinion (agree), At the present moment (now), By means of (by), Less frequently occurring (rare). Wordy vs Pointed: in spite of the fact that (although), in the event that (if), period of four days (four days), refer back (refer), shorter/longer in length (shorter/longer), had been previously found (hand been found). Ask these questions again and again: Is this word/phrase necessary?, What happens if I take it out? If it is not critical (not changing anything), remove it.

2. Use active voice. When use passive voice, the sentence becomes hard to read, and not actually gives who did the experiment. Use we found major differences.... We did this, We did that, etc.

3. Use parallel construction: If you want to be a good researcher, you must study hard, listen well, and think critically about the literature.

4. Start paragraph with main point: Start the paragraphs with your main point then expand (Professor's favorite). This is important to write a crisp clear paper. Every paragraph should start with the main idea of the whole paragraph. Rest of the sentences are should be just details explaining the first sentence. If you take first sentences of all the paragraphs and put them together, it should form the abstract.

If you want to write a sentence and if you don't know how to order it, always bring the important points front.

Know the difference between the introduction and discussion. 
In introduction, start with what is available, then explain what is missing, then your work (i.e., the introduction moves from general to specific)
In the discussion, at the end, say what amazing thing you did is going to revolutionize the word  (The discussion moves from specific to general). You know the simplification, why and what you did some body else would care, and why the deficiencies you have might or might not be fundamental (which is pretty important). Put your work in the big picture. Your performance is not the best. But, put the minor drawback of the work. 

In results, you show the number. In discussion, you show the big picture. The discussion should be the big picture. Not the little details.

Most important things not to put in the discussion
Do not simply repeat what is in the Results
Do not try to explain every minor flaw
Do not try to explain away every unexpected result
Do not exaggerate or make extravagant claims 
Don't hedge
(Editors and reviewers may read only this part, if they are busy. They don't care about the number. They care about the big picture.)

Need to attract very wide audience. But don't over claim and don't exaggerate. 
















You may be interested in these posts

Error in image file conversion: convert-im6.q16: not authorized `test.eps' @ error/constitute.c/WriteImage/1037.

This error is because of the vulnerability. This allows remote execution of code using image formats. So, some Linux distributions by defaul...